Celebrating David Quigley To Restore Our Nation’s Life. Yay!
Celebrating David Quigley To Restore Our Nation’s Life. Yay!
by Mary W Maxwell, LLB
Last night, July 13, 2024, I was invited to speak on a zoom podcast about a happy
event. Namely the “coming out” of David Quigley. I had heard of him only recently.
To be exact, I read his story a week ago, on July 7, and wrote it up as two articles at Australia’s GumshoeNews.com, on July 8th and 11th.
His story has some bad things in it, for which the baddies deserve – maybe – to be hunted down. But I am sick of bad things (aren’t you?) and want to focus only on the happy, wonderful side of the David Quigley story.
In a nutshell, David’s date of birth is November 25, 1960; he is now 63 years old. He was born to President-elect John F Kennedy, and Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy. He was given the name “John F Kennedy, Jr.” Up until the day of JFK’s assassination in 1963, dear little John was part of American culture, part of that good-looking young family in the White House.
I was in high school at the time. The national mood was one of exuberance. As everyone knows, it stopped being exuberant and is currently in decline, if not freefall. But we have a unique chance to get back the exuberance. A genuine breakthrough, of nearly miraculous quality, has occurred.
The “Mafia” Scheme, for Money
Although you may not believe Mr Quigley’s allegations, please play along with me for a few minutes so I don’t have to stop to defend him against every eager “debunker.” I am a good ol’ debunker myself, in fact I may be bronze medal material in that sport. But the fact is, Quigley has an ace to play – we’ll get to it later.
Oh and by the way, if you are one of the killers, don’t rush to look up my GPS whereabouts with an eye to killing me, as that would be self-defeating for you. I have something bigger than a cupcake for all of us, to be explained later. Your future could be happier than you have ever imagined.
So what happened was that at the age of 8, five years after “Dallas,” little John got taken away and put into Witness Protection, or something along those lines. Another boy, whom we all know as John F Kennedy Jr, and who later died in a 1999 plane crash at Martha’s Vineyard, was sent in to live as Jacqueline’s son.
Quigley describes that boy as a “Replacement:” and says that the mafia often engages in replacing wealthy people. That is, they observe a person who has major holdings in a bank, then they kill that person (provided he or she has no relatives who would speak up), and step in with their Replacement person. There is nothing to prevent that person waltzing into the bank, and withdrawing “his” or “her” funds.
Note: The death of the real owner would not have been listed in the Obituaries. The whole thing is secret. The Replacer look physically like the real owner. If that makes you wonder how the “mafia” is able to get ahold of persuasive look-alikes, you haven’t been paying attention to human trafficking, have you. Or you haven’t read the ads for plastic surgery.
Just imagine if you knew of an old lady with billions in the bank or in real estate, and your senior-citizen aunt happens to resemble her, and this aunt has a sense of adventure, wouldn’t you be getting a notion? Well, in the Quigley story, the Replacers are not usually the ones who got a notion; they are slaves and are under a form of mind control. He says it’s “the mafia,” but I hesitate to use that term as, frankly, I can’t discern the line that divides organized crime from government.
Folks, we all have a picture-book idea of what the American government is. Betcha it’ a far cry from reality. Walking around with big misconceptions of reality can be hazardous.
Our Man Quigley As a Truck Driver
For about 18 bucks at Amazon, you can buy the book Stolen Identity (2023). The author lists his name as “John F Kennedy, Jr” but I am trying to consistently call him “David Quigley” for two reasons.
First, it is a damned nuisance to have to keep repeating “Hey, I am NOT referring to the 38-year-old John F Kennedy, Jr who died in the plane crash near Martha’s Vineyard.” Second, I want to introduce the idea that this man, David, deserves the dignity of being recognized for having lived his life, quite irrespective of his blood ties to any family. And he has a moral compass! Jeepers.
David’s life was no bed of roses. It was very harsh. And he has murdered people, too. Mostly he was in poverty. As an 8-year-old, he was placed into the Quigley family of Arizona. He says they were cruel to him. Oh really? Yes, oh really. Wake up; this is part of the STANDARD way that our government (ahem, is it really our government?) treated kids in the MK-Ultra program. The goal was to render them ego-less. ISN’T THAT AWFUL?
Note: I promised in the title of this article that there’ll be something to celebrate. How about this: “The David Quigley revelations have led ordinary citizens (yes, even you, Joe Six-pack) to find out about all sorts of backroom dealery, and thus to do something about it (yes even you, Joe Sixpack).” Is that not something to celebrate?
Anyway, David got beat-up on many occasions, sometimes by persons who had posed as his buddies. I don’t know how he withstood it all. He did construction work for as little as two dollars an hour. He got raped. He got robbed. Finally he got employment as a truck driver, which brought a bit more financial freedom, and some quiet hours on the road, far from home.
“Home” was a movable feast. Until he was 15, his biological mother, Jackie, did spend some time with him. After leaving 1600 Pennsylvania Av, in1963, she seemed to have addresses in New York city and on Skorpios Island in Greece with Aristotle Onassis.
David Quigley also spent time at those two addresses! Remember he did not get “thrown to the winds” till he was 8 years old in 1968, and even after that he occasionally saw Mom, including on the Onassis yacht and Skorpios Island. Never mind that the new (replacement) John F Kennedy Jr was also there! I have seen at least one photo of the two boys together, looking alike.
So How Can a Mother Abandon Her Son?
Dear Reader, I have no desire to judge any member of the Kennedy clan. No, notta one. But I know how strong the mother-child bond is, so something must be said about this extreme separation of an 8-year-old boy from his Mom. From the years 1968 to 1975, Jackie apparently accepted the situation. I’m assuming it was “Do or die.”
Did he go to her and say “The Quigley parents are treating me horribly?” From what I know about MK-Ultra (mainly from reading many books by survivors), no, David would not have ratted on his “adoptive” parents. That’s because, when he was on Skorpios, or in Jackie’s NY apartment, David would not be David, He would switch back into his John personality.
I have no knowledge of what went on between him and the other John. Possibly that other John was just as much a victim of mind-control. (Note: I use the term “MK-Ultra” a bit loosely to mean all kinds of ways to get into the brain of another.)
Another thought: Maybe all the guys at the top are also under mind control. George Orwell suggested something along those lines, in his “novel” 1984, which he wrote in 1949.
After 1975
Dear Reader, I want so much to get you to look upon the David affair, and its outing, as a positive. I know of no such moments in American history where a complete change of perspective has occurred. Honest, the scales my drop from the eyes of all of us. Just the giving up of wrong beliefs may lead to all manner of creative ideas for the future!
But for the moment, as I am trying to sell you the facts of David as facts, I have to fess up to some items in his story that sound like a crock. Which would you prefer first, the story of Caroline’s violent death in 1975? You may be pleased to hear that I have more than an ounce of skepticism about this. David says he not only witnessed Caroline’s death – she was 18; he was 14 – but was ordered to strike her with a golf club after she was dead, on the grass.
My problem with the story is that if it is true, then the girl who became an adult Caroline, and married Mr Schlossberg, and had children with him, and is now the US Ambassador to Australia, is not the Caroline of the White House. Ergo she is a Replacement. A bit hard to swallow, right?
In particular I think Her Excellency Mrs Schlossberg-Kennedy’s oldest girl, Rose, who graduated from Harvard around 2020, looks just like grandmother Jackie.
As for the Year 1975, David alleges it was also the year of Jackie’s death. We’ve all been given the official narrative: Jackie Kennedy Onassis lived till 1994, and died of cancer, in New York. Her husband Ari Onassis had died on the Ides of March, 1975 at age 69, in a Paris Hospital.
All I have to go on, regarding the alleged “1975 death” of Jacqueline, is David Quigley’s word.
And I am buying it, until someone can convince me otherwise.
David Has an Ace
Let me now tell you why I believe David. I would probably believe him based on a 12-minute speech that he made in 2019 (it’s now on Rumble,com) -- despite it containing several too-far-out details. He just strikes me as truthful -- and there are de-classified materials proving what was done to American children in the CIA’s MK-Ultra project. It involved many people whom you would unthinkingly respect but who were rats or devils, in government, military, hospitals and universities.
Am I willing to risk my reputation, claiming that the famous grown-up John F Kennedy, Jr (plane crash, 1999) is not the son of JFK and Jackie? Yes. I say that the grownup boy ain’t the little boy we see in all the toddler photos, including the most iconic shot of “John-John” saluting the casket in the funeral parade. (That was exactly on his 3rd birthday, November 25. 1963.) That little one is the real son of the President. David. Now age 63.
Clearly, that little boy has “detached” earlobes, but grownup John (who married Carolyn Bessette) had “attached” earlobes. And you can’t start out with one kind of earlobe as a child and up with a different kind as an adult. (The majority of humans have the detached kind.)
This isn’t an effort to disqualify big John for lack of resemblance to his parents – not all people look like their Mom or Dad. And it’s not the same as getting a DNA test to see which ancestors had which kind of earlobes. All I declare is that the grownup John is not the same as the saluting child – as can be seen with the naked eye. The earlobe differential is David’s ace.
Patriotism
Instinctively, I want to say “Sorry, forgive me,” as I have similarly felt like saying “Sorry” for being a whistleblower type in other cases. We whistleblower types are generally hated. People think our message, about 9/11 or whatever, is naughty. It goes against patriotism, doesn’t it?
Well, maybe it does or maybe it doesn’t. But this outing of the David Quigley thing can’t be unpatriotic. If someone, some very bad force in America, caused that little kid, whom we in the Boomer generation loved, to be thrown into a life of violence and loneliness -- that isn’t something you want kept hidden, is it?
The patriotic thing to do here is not to denigrate the late grownup John, or to curse any of the many persons who went along with the gag. The patriotic thing is to reclaim reality, and stop being afraid to tell the truth.
As a bonus, a really big bonus, telling the truth about this seemingly small matter will free a lot of wrongdoers from having to keep up the complicated lies.
Plus, it’s a happy thing. Long lost American shows up at the ranch. Boy who struggled and was kicked around now gets to have people wanting to shake his hand.
This also gives us some way to start planning for the future, using our myriad talents instead of repeating the mantra that only a handful of Top Dogs will decide everything for us.
If you honor David Quigley, you will be honoring yourself.
Start celebrating today. Hooray! Yipee! Flag waving! Smiles! Hugs!
-- Mary Maxwell can be reached at MaxwellMaryLLB@gmail.com. If she gets any updates on the matter at hand, including good challenges, she will post them on her website: www.ConstitutionAndTruth.com. She is also the host of www.JaharCompletelyInnocent.com